(?) (?)
ID# 13351, b. about 1500
Birth:
(?) (?) was born about 1500
 .
Marriage:
(?) (?) married Roger Dernylegh about 1520
 .
Children of (?) (?) and Roger Dernylegh
- Roger Dernylegh+ b. abt 1520
- Geoffrey Dernylegh b. abt 1523
- Robert Dernylegh b. 1528
Robert Dernylegh
ID# 13352, b. 1528
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Robert Dernylegh was born in 1528
 .
Robert Dernylegh was the son of Roger Dernylegh and (?) (?)
Geoffrey Dernylegh
ID# 13353, b. about 1523
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Geoffrey Dernylegh was born about 1523
 .
Geoffrey Dernylegh was the son of Roger Dernylegh and (?) (?)
Roger Dernylegh
ID# 13354, b. about 1520
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Roger Dernylegh was born about 1520
 .
Roger Dernylegh was the son of Roger Dernylegh and (?) (?)
Marriage:
Roger Dernylegh married Unknown (?) about 1540
 .
Child of Roger Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
- John Dernylegh+ b. abt 1540
Unknown (?)
ID# 13355, b. about 1520
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Unknown (?) was born about 1520
 .
Marriage:
Unknown (?) married Roger Dernylegh, son of Roger Dernylegh and (?) (?), about 1540
 .
Child of Unknown (?) and Roger Dernylegh
- John Dernylegh+ b. abt 1540
John Dernylegh
ID# 13356, b. about 1540
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
John Dernylegh was born about 1540
 .
John Dernylegh was the son of Roger Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
Marriage:
John Dernylegh married Unknown (?) about 1560
 .
Child of John Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
- Roger Dernylegh+ b. abt 1560
Unknown (?)
ID# 13357, b. about 1540
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Unknown (?) was born about 1540
 .
Marriage:
Unknown (?) married John Dernylegh, son of Roger Dernylegh and Unknown (?), about 1560
 .
Child of Unknown (?) and John Dernylegh
- Roger Dernylegh+ b. abt 1560
Roger Dernylegh
ID# 13358, b. about 1560
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Roger Dernylegh was born about 1560
 .
Roger Dernylegh was the son of John Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
Marriage:
Roger Dernylegh married Unknown (?) about 1580
 .
Child of Roger Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
- Roger Dernylegh b. abt 1579, d. a 1580
Unknown (?)
ID# 13359, b. about 1560
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
It is taken from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
Birth:
Unknown (?) was born about 1560
 .
Marriage:
Unknown (?) married Roger Dernylegh, son of John Dernylegh and Unknown (?), about 1580
 .
Child of Unknown (?) and Roger Dernylegh
- Roger Dernylegh b. abt 1579, d. a 1580
Roger Dernylegh
ID# 13360, b. about 1579, d. after 1580
** IGNORE Dernylegh line**
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
We believe this line is erroneous and that the Dernylegh family tree is just a poor interpretation of a complicated document.
This pedigree is from "History of the Parish of Rochdale" p.422. see Early Dearnleys (about half-way down)
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
For this pedigree to work, the Roger Dernylegh of Glossop shown as “liv. 1580” would have to be the infant son of the Roger D. bringing the suit. Also the siblings Robert, Geoffrey & Roger would have to be written in a non-traditional order. Roger being the first-born son born before 1526.
BUT - it would be unusual for an infant to be known as “Roger Dernylegh of Glossop”
- MED.
However, there appears to be more generations shown than are possible.
For this pedigree to work, the Roger Dernylegh of Glossop shown as “liv. 1580” would have to be the infant son of the Roger D. bringing the suit. Also the siblings Robert, Geoffrey & Roger would have to be written in a non-traditional order. Roger being the first-born son born before 1526.
BUT - it would be unusual for an infant to be known as “Roger Dernylegh of Glossop”
- MED.
Birth:
Roger Dernylegh was born about 1579
 .
in 1579 Roger Dernylegh lived at Glossop, Derbyshire, England,
 .
Roger Dernylegh was the son of Roger Dernylegh and Unknown (?)
Death:
Roger Dernylegh died after 1580
 .