Frederick Stocks
ID# 18581, b. 1890
Birth:
Frederick Stocks was born in 1890 at Rochdale, Lancashire, England,
.
Frederick Stocks was the son of Richard Hartley Stocks and Margaret Iveson.
Charley Stocks
ID# 18582, b. 1893
Birth:
Charley Stocks was born in 1893 at Rochdale, Lancashire, England,
.
Charley Stocks was the son of Richard Hartley Stocks and Margaret Iveson.
Roger Whitehead
ID# 18583, b. about 1405
- Charts
- Roger Dearnley (c.1335-)
In 1444 Roger Whitehead and Margaret his wife, together with Ellen Dearnley, recovered a moiety of two messuages, 40 acres of land. &c., in Hundersfield and Spotland, which Roger Dearnley had given to John Dearnley and his issue, and which after the death of John's son Geoffrey should descend to Margaret and Ellen, daughters of Geoffrey; Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 6, m. 12.
The same plaintiffs claimed the other moiety against Alexander son of Roger Butterworth; he replied that there was another daughter of Geoffrey, viz. Mary, still living at Newcastle on Tyne, but they said she had died at Chadderton in 1442; ibid. m. 12b
Ian Goddard notes:
If we exclude Roger doing something completely mischievous such as leaving the property to John over the head of an older son then the most likely scenario I can think of is this: Geoffrey is the older son, marries & sets up home elsewhere. He also has a younger son who stays at home and maybe also has a family thus:
Roger
John
Geoffrey
Mary d Chadderton 1442
Margaret = Roger Whitehead
Ellen
Unknown daughter = Roger Butterworth
Alexander Butterworth
Unknown I
Unknown II
When Geoffrey dies, which I suppose must have been about 1443 or 1444, Unknown I, if still living, or Unknown II stays on in possession along with Alexander (maybe the Butterworths also lived at the property) and these became the defendants. It would help to know the exact terms under which Roger left the property. If it was heirs male and Geoffrey only had daughters then AIUI the unknown son would have been the legitimate heir. Presumably the plaintiffs must have persuaded the court that this was not the case.
The same plaintiffs claimed the other moiety against Alexander son of Roger Butterworth; he replied that there was another daughter of Geoffrey, viz. Mary, still living at Newcastle on Tyne, but they said she had died at Chadderton in 1442; ibid. m. 12b
Ian Goddard notes:
If we exclude Roger doing something completely mischievous such as leaving the property to John over the head of an older son then the most likely scenario I can think of is this: Geoffrey is the older son, marries & sets up home elsewhere. He also has a younger son who stays at home and maybe also has a family thus:
Roger
John
Geoffrey
Mary d Chadderton 1442
Margaret = Roger Whitehead
Ellen
Unknown daughter = Roger Butterworth
Alexander Butterworth
Unknown I
Unknown II
When Geoffrey dies, which I suppose must have been about 1443 or 1444, Unknown I, if still living, or Unknown II stays on in possession along with Alexander (maybe the Butterworths also lived at the property) and these became the defendants. It would help to know the exact terms under which Roger left the property. If it was heirs male and Geoffrey only had daughters then AIUI the unknown son would have been the legitimate heir. Presumably the plaintiffs must have persuaded the court that this was not the case.
Birth:
Roger Whitehead was born about 1405
.
Marriage:
Roger Whitehead married Margaret Dearnley, daughter of Geoffrey Dearnley and (?) (?), about 1426
.
Unknown Dearnley
ID# 18584, b. about 1379
- Charts
- Roger Dearnley (c.1335-)
Birth:
Unknown Dearnley was born about 1379
.
Unknown Dearnley was the daughter of John Dearnley and Unknown (?)
Marriage:
Unknown Dearnley married Roger Butterworth about 1400
.
Child of Unknown Dearnley and Roger Butterworth
- Alexander Butterworth b. abt 1402
Roger Butterworth
ID# 18585, b. about 1379
- Charts
- Roger Dearnley (c.1335-)
In 1444 Roger Whitehead and Margaret his wife, together with Ellen Dearnley, recovered a moiety of two messuages, 40 acres of land. &c., in Hundersfield and Spotland, which Roger Dearnley had given to John Dearnley and his issue, and which after the death of John's son Geoffrey should descend to Margaret and Ellen, daughters of Geoffrey; Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 6, m. 12.
The same plaintiffs claimed the other moiety against Alexander son of Roger Butterworth; he replied that there was another daughter of Geoffrey, viz. Mary, still living at Newcastle on Tyne, but they said she had died at Chadderton in 1442; ibid. m. 12b
Ian Goddard notes:
If we exclude Roger doing something completely mischievous such as leaving the property to John over the head of an older son then the most likely scenario I can think of is this: Geoffrey is the older son, marries & sets up home elsewhere. He also has a younger son who stays at home and maybe also has a family thus:
When Geoffrey dies, which I suppose must have been about 1443 or 1444, Unknown I, if still living, or Unknown II stays on in possession along with Alexander (maybe the Butterworths also lived at the property) and these became the defendants. It would help to know the exact terms under which Roger left the property. If it was heirs male and Geoffrey only had daughters then AIUI the unknown son would have been the legitimate heir. Presumably the plaintiffs must have persuaded the court that this was not the case.
The same plaintiffs claimed the other moiety against Alexander son of Roger Butterworth; he replied that there was another daughter of Geoffrey, viz. Mary, still living at Newcastle on Tyne, but they said she had died at Chadderton in 1442; ibid. m. 12b
Ian Goddard notes:
If we exclude Roger doing something completely mischievous such as leaving the property to John over the head of an older son then the most likely scenario I can think of is this: Geoffrey is the older son, marries & sets up home elsewhere. He also has a younger son who stays at home and maybe also has a family thus:
Roger
John
Geoffrey
Mary d Chadderton 1442
Margaret = Roger Whitehead
Ellen
Unknown daughter = Roger Butterworth
Alexander Butterworth
Unknown I
Unknown II
When Geoffrey dies, which I suppose must have been about 1443 or 1444, Unknown I, if still living, or Unknown II stays on in possession along with Alexander (maybe the Butterworths also lived at the property) and these became the defendants. It would help to know the exact terms under which Roger left the property. If it was heirs male and Geoffrey only had daughters then AIUI the unknown son would have been the legitimate heir. Presumably the plaintiffs must have persuaded the court that this was not the case.
Birth:
Roger Butterworth was born about 1379
.
Marriage:
Roger Butterworth married Unknown Dearnley, daughter of John Dearnley and Unknown (?), about 1400
.
Child of Roger Butterworth and Unknown Dearnley
- Alexander Butterworth b. abt 1402
Alexander Butterworth
ID# 18586, b. about 1402
- Charts
- Roger Dearnley (c.1335-)
We are currently assuming that Nicholas Butterworth c.1460- is a descendant of Alexander.
Birth:
Alexander Butterworth was born about 1402
.
Alexander Butterworth was the son of Roger Butterworth and Unknown Dearnley.
Ada Dollin
ID# 18587, b. about August 1872, d. about May 1886
- Charts
- James Dollin (c.1763-)
Birth:
Ada Dollin was born about August 1872 at Lyme Regis, Dorset, England,
.
Ada Dollin was the daughter of Frederick Eli Dollin and Diana Grinter.
Death:
Ada Dollin died about May 1886 at Axminster, Devon, England,
aged 13 yrs.
Matilda Fox Martin
ID# 18588, b. 1837
- Charts
- James Dollin (c.1763-)
Birth:
Matilda Fox Martin was born in 1837 at Southampton, Hampshire, England,
.
Matilda Fox Martin was the daughter of John Martin.
Marriage:
Matilda Fox Martin married John Dollin, son of Eli Dollin and Elizabeth Quick, on 7 February 1859 at Southampton, Hampshire, England,
.
Children of Matilda Fox Martin and John Dollin
- Susan Elizabeth Dollin b. Jun 1860
- Matilda Alice Dollin+ b. 23 Mar 1862
- Fred Dollin b. abt 1865
- Albert Dollin b. abt 1867
- John Dollin b. abt Feb 1869
- Anne Dollin b. Feb 1871
- Ellen Dollin b. abt Nov 1873
- Harry Dollin b. abt 1877
- Bessie Dollin b. abt May 1878
- Thomas Dollin b. Jun 1880
Susan Elizabeth Dollin
ID# 18589, b. June 1860
- Charts
- James Dollin (c.1763-)
Birth:
Susan Elizabeth Dollin was born in June 1860 at Southampton, Hampshire, England,
.
Susan Elizabeth Dollin was the daughter of John Dollin and Matilda Fox Martin.
Matilda Alice Dollin
ID# 18590, b. 23 March 1862
- Charts
- James Dollin (c.1763-)
Birth:
Matilda Alice Dollin was born on 23 March 1862 at Southampton, Hampshire, England,
.
Matilda Alice Dollin was the daughter of John Dollin and Matilda Fox Martin.
Marriage:
Matilda Alice Dollin married Frederick Richards Matthews about February 1884 at Southampton, Hampshire, England,
.
Children of Matilda Alice Dollin and Frederick Richards Matthews
- William Matthews b. 1884
- Frederick Matthews b. 1885
- Emily Matthews b. 1886
- Nellie Matthews b. 1888
- Bessie Matthews b. Jun 1890
- Bertie Matthews b. 1892
- Albert Matthews b. 1895
- Alfred Matthews b. 1898
- Elsie Matthews b. 1902
- Jack Matthews b. 1904
- Lily Matthews b. 1905